Case strength
The ten categories
Every successful run scores the matter out of 100 in ten categories.
| Category | |
|---|---|
| Overall strength | The headline figure. |
| Liability | Damages |
| Evidence | Witness credibility |
| Defendant exposure | Settlement leverage |
| Trial readiness | Procedural risk |
| Case completion |
A category the run could not price shows as not scored.
Movement
A score that changed since the previous version shows its previous value and, on expansion, why it moved — in prose, tied to the developments that caused it.
A score seen for the first time is marked New; one that did not move is marked No change.
Score history draws the trend across versions for whichever category you pick, with each point labelled by version and the phase the matter was in.
A matter getting weaker is shown as plainly as one getting stronger. That is the point of keeping every version.
Overriding a score
An attorney can override any score with a value and a required reason.
The override is what the product then shows, marked Overridden, with a note recording who set it, to what, and what the engine had scored. Remove override hands the category back to the engine.
An override does not silence the engine. Later runs still score the category; you keep seeing what it thinks alongside what you decided.
On the dashboard
Portfolio strength splits every analysed matter into four bands — Strong (80+), Good (60–79), Moderate (40–59), Weak (under 40) — plus the matters not yet analysed, and gives the firm-wide average.
Score movement lists the matters whose overall strength moved most recently, with the version and when.
Both are scoped to the matters you are on.
Where the numbers do not appear
The run review screen carries no model, token or cost figure. Spend is tracked for the firm’s own books and is not shown on a matter.